You are currently viewing the archive for the Campbell, Colin category.

Australia First: Beneath the Surface

From the Oz:

White supremacy in our backyard

Australia First says publicly it’s not a racist party. Dan Box went under cover for months to get the real story

——————————————————————————–

March 04, 2006

ONCE a month, the local branch of the Australia First party meets in the backyard of a small house in Tempe, inner-western Sydney, to drink beer, cook sausages and plot the triumph of the white race.

Last Saturday, however, was a “special meeting”, hosted at home by the party’s state co-ordinator, Jim Saleam.

Up for debate was how to turn the rollercoaster of publicity received after the Cronulla race riots into a legitimate political campaign.

While Australia First is commonly described as a neo-Nazi party, publicly the party claims it is not a racist organisation.

It says it is looking to legitimise itself, eyeing the next local council elections in Cronulla’s Sutherland Shire as a starting point.

Privately, the backyard drinkers can’t help themselves.

Speaking to The Weekend Australian, which attended the meeting using an assumed name, Jeremy Costello recalled a recent drive to Bondi, where he saw a rabbi walking down the road.

“We leaned out of the window and shouted ‘Sieg heil! Sieg heil!’,” he said.

“Shit, these rabbis take things seriously.”

News brief · 4 March 2006

Ground control to Reverend Col

Take your ’special pills’ and put your tin-foil helmet on.

This entry courtesy of @ndy.

Let’s face it, David Innes’ mate Colin Campbell is stark, raving… mad. As a cut snake. As a meat axe. Bananas. He’s a broken packet of biscuits, as ugly as a box of blowflies, and he couldn’t organise a root in a brothel. To be honest, I think he’s got the Darling pea and doesn’t know if it’s Pitt street or Christmas. Then again, with an ideology that handles like a dog on lino, it’s no wonder he’s got kangaroos loose in the top paddock. Or to put it another way: the lights are on but nobody’s home (the mystery bag that passes for his brain is empty) and consequently he feels like a pork chop in a synagogue. And despite this bloke not being the full quid / a snag short of a barbie / a couple of tinnies short of a slab, he still claims to be as proud as a rat with a gold tooth! Personally, I think he’s got tickets on himself, and posing in front of a German WWII Navy flag with the swastika ‘cleverly’ replaced by a symbol for his daft ‘church’ only confirms it.

Fight dem back · 4 February 2006 · Discussion

Terror Manual pulled offline

No suprises here.

The White Resistance Terror manual which we reported to the ABC has now been taken offline.

The Rev Col Campbell explains the recent media attention directed his way with the following nutjob rant:

Fight dem back · 4 February 2006 · Discussion

Baron in denial (again)

The nuts and bolts.

Baron Von Hund (David Innes) is denying that Col Campbell of networkwhite.net is his host. And with the amount of media/police attention directed at Col right now, who can blame the Baron for doing a “wasn’t me”.

Fight dem back · 3 February 2006 · Discussion

What’s a Rahowa anyway?


Aussie Creators celebrate ‘Klassen Day’ with a cold VB

This entry has been updated

Damn, baby!

Those silly boys over at the World Church of the Creator/Rahowa are getting themselves into all kinds of trouble.

But who are the Rahowa, and why, and where, and how?

Intrepid FDBer Raz has obliged us with this wee history of our friendly neighbourhood neo-Nazi death cult, so please, read on.

BUT!

We warn you… this crap will turn your freaking stomach. (Oh, and it’s pretty freaking long too)

Fight dem back · 1 February 2006 · Discussion

At first I was afraid (I was petrified)

From the Adelaide Addy:

We will survive: racist group.

By PAUL STARICK
01 Feb 06

ADELAIDE-based white supremacists are advocating “open warfare” if their “rights to survival” are under threat, according to a statement emailed to The Advertiser.

In the statement, operators of a racist website argue their organisation is peaceful.

But the statement says it will “meet force with force”, resulting in “open warfare” if its rights to practice its “religion” are violated.

News brief · 1 February 2006